David Burch wants to educate us about Electronic Navigation Charts (ENC)

Ben Ellison

Ben Ellison

Panbo editor, publisher & chief bottlewasher from 4/2005 until 8/2018, and now pleased to have Ben Stein as a very able publisher, webmaster, and editing colleague. Please don't regard him as an "expert"; he's getting quite old and thinks that "fadiddling fumble-putz" is a more accurate description.

10 Responses

  1. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Another good ENC resource is NOAA itself — https://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/charts/noaa-enc.html — and for some valuable detail on “rescheming” and where official vector charting is headed after that, check out:

    https://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/publications/docs/nautical-charting-plan.pdf

  2. Martin says:

    It’s not clear to me what the difference in definition is between an ENC and a vector chart such as Navionics. I think many recreational sailors are very familiar with vector charts thanks to the Navionics App on their smartphones and tablets.

    • Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

      Hi Martin. As Burch points out “ENC is a legally defined term that refers only to charts that meet the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) chart standard S-57”. So, yes, Navionics are vector charts — and much of the underlying data comes from ENC produced by NOAA and other hydrographic offices — but they are not ENC and they can not serve as official charts. Some mariners are required to use official charts, others like me (at age 77) learned to navigate on paper charts and still like to have the RNC equivalent on display as a familiar and official reference.

      That said, I’ve also happily used Navionics and other vector chart formats. Without the constraints of international standards and government agency bureaucracy, the non-official chart manufacturers can add valuable features, like Navionics Sonar Charts, for instance. But then again, it’s hard to know what Navionics and others are leaving out unless you get familiar with the detail of ENC.

      One good example is Zones of Confidence (ZoC), an IHO initiative to clarify degrees of depth sounding accuracy that I wrote about in 2016:

      https://panbo.com/noaa-introduces-zones-of-confidence-mind-your-zoc/

      Using the Navionics app to query depth soundings on their chart, I see no mention of ZoC. But using NOAA’s ENC Viewer for the same area (where I cruise in Maine), I can see that in some sections the ZoC grade is “D” for quite poor, probably because the bottom hasn’t been surveyed since 1909, and that means much less accurate tools were used. The viewer can even overlay ZoC grade symbols over the chart so you can get a quick view of presumed accuracy.

      https://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/enconline/enconline.html

      Navionics or any other vector chart manufacturer, along with the plotter manufacturer who supports their charts, could offer us the same ENC feature, but I’m not sure that any has?

  3. John Cook says:

    I hope mariners realize that ENC from NOAA and IENC from USACE are free to download and update. Use a system that accepts S57 and be wary of off the shelf systems that “sell” electronic charts.

  4. David Burch says:

    Hi Ben, thanks for this announcement. I am standing by to answer any questions i can about these charts… and the new reschemed versions.

  5. Robert says:

    I have both of David Burch’s books you mention. The newer, skinnier, ENC Essentials book strikes me as too limited for anyone actually interested in the topic.

    His older/larger book “Introduction to Electronic Chart Navigation” on the other hand is an excellent book, and perfect to reading while you have navigation software running on a tablet or laptop right in front of you.

  6. Robert says:

    Hi David, I am interested in your opinion on the implementation of S-100 charting system, whether we’re going to get S101 ENC’s in early in 2025 as the IHO currently predict, and what effect that might have on recreational users of ENC

  7. David Burch says:

    Hi Robert, I do not think we will see S-100 data this year in typical nav programs used by recreational mariners. In part because they are abandoning the grib format and switching to all HD5, which to my knowledge none of the programs support nor are even working toward conversions. The anticipated data, however, are very promising. See https://marinenavigation.noaa.gov/s100.html . The proposed “new” weather data is actually not quite up to par with what we already have in grib format, although it will in principle be included in the S-100 ENC making it very easy to access, rather than be a separate overlay as we do now using grib files. Bur frankly, recreational mariners already have essentially state of the art weather options. Also we do now have digital tides and currents that we can use in optimum sailboat routing. These are from the NOAA Operational Forecast (OFS) model. To my knowledge the only grib source of the data is from the LuckGrib app (iOS or Mac), which lets us export the data to other nav apps. What is exciting to look forward to is the digital bathymetry which then, using digital tides, gives us real water depths at all locations. Note that programs like qtVlm allow us to now load shape files of the digital elevation and depth contours onto to ENC, so we are definitely moving toward more GIS oriented navigational charting, which is what the S-100 system represents.

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *