Charging LiFePO4, what’s the impact of lower voltages?
What voltage should I charge my LiFePO4 batteries? That seems like a simple question likely to have a single, direct answer. But, the actual answers are often unclear. Many LiFePO4 battery manufacturers recommend 14.6 volt absorption. But, that singular recommendation doesn’t account for numerous factors like managing a larger system, battery longevity, and more. Increasingly, we are seeing good reasons to lower charge voltages to 14 volts or below. But, what impact does that lower charge voltage have on capacity and charge time? Let’s take a look.
Recently in my testing I have seen several 12-volt Epoch Batteries equipped with a feature that disconnects charging when the BMS sees charging over 14 volts and under 3.5 amps. This feature attempts avoid damage to the battery from extended high voltage charging. But, it also comes with some unintended consequences as charge sources aren’t designed for disconnection while charging.
Preventing charge disconnects isn’t the only reason to use a low absorption voltage with LiFePO4 batteries. Rod Collins of MarineHowTo has long advocated for lower charge voltages. In fact, he has a 15 year old, 400 amp-hour battery he built back in 2010 that he exclusively charges at 13.8 volt absorption. That 15 year old battery has done more than 2500 cycles and still tests over 103 percent of rated capacity.
LiFePO4 battery manufacturers regularly call for an absorption voltage between 14.2 and 14.6 volts. So, what are the ramifactions of charging at a lower voltage? First, keep in mind that in lead acid batteries we use a relatively high absorption voltage in order to put some heat into the batteries and sluff off any sulfation that may have formed on the battery. With LFP batteries, that isn’t a concern or necessary.
So, the two main factors likely to be impacted by lower charge voltages would be capacity and charge time. Specifically, we want to know if the battery delivers less power if charged at, for example, 13.8 volts than it will if charged at 14.4 volts.
Testing capacity and charge times
To understand the impact of lower voltage charging, I’ve done a series of tests with a 100 amp hour Epoch 12-volt battery. I reviewed these batteries early last year — and missed the full charge disconnect feature — and found they regularly delivered well over their rated capacity. Using a 40 amp, electronically controlled power supply, I fully charged the battery from 13.2 to 14.2 volts. My power supply uses sense leads to ensure the battery measures the correct voltage at its terminals.
I then tested the capacity using a 10 amp discharge rate. Effectively, this is a 10 hour capacity test for this battery. That’s more aggressive than a BCI 20-hour capacity test but gives a basis for comparison. I selected a 10 hour test just to try and minimize the time required to complete the tests. I don’t expect the capacity numbers would be very different with 20 hour tests. LFP batteries have a much lower Peukert’s exponent than lead-acid; meaning the discharge rate has a smaller impact on capacity.
| Charged voltage | Capacity @ 10 hour rundown | Charge time (hh:mm) |
| 14.6 | 105.96 ah | 2:45 |
| 14.5 | 106.14 ah | 2:46 |
| 14.4 | 106.51 ah | 2:48 |
| 14.3 | 105.90 ah | 2:50 |
| 14.2 | 106.56 ah | 2:51 |
| 14.1 | 106.49 ah | 2:51 |
| 14 | 106.67 ah | 2:53 |
| 13.9 | 106.89 ah | 3:37 |
| 13.8 | 106.7 ah | 3:43 |
| 13.7 | 106.69 ah | 3:59 |
| 13.6 | 106.6 ah | 4:39 |
| 13.5 | 106.15 ah | 6:15 |
| 13.4 | 103.32 ah | 17:10 |
| 13.3 | 65.83 ah | 10:49* |
| 13.2 | 30.59 ah | 8:28** |
As we can see in the data, capacity really doesn’t vary until we drop below 13.5 volts absorption. But, while capacity is quite stable, lowering absorption voltage steadily increases the time it takes to reach full charge. At 13.4 volts, it takes a full seventeen hours and ten minutes to achieve full charge. Absorption voltage below 13.4 doesn’t fully charge the battery. Using a 40 amp charger to replace 106 or so amp hours, the theoretical minimum time would be two hours and thirty nine minutes. By 14.1 volts, we are within 12 minutes of that figure and not likely to improve much due to charge taper near 100 percent SOC.
Time to absorption
My first thought when I looked at the results was, well capacity doesn’t take much of a hit, but charge time sure does. However, it occurred to me that the additional time is probably mostly at the very end of charging as the battery has already reached a high SOC. Indeed, the chart above shows the details for charging to 13.9 volts. It took two hours and forty one minutes for the battery to reach the transition point from bulk to absorption. At that time, SOC measured at 98.4 percent. The remaining 1.6 percent took an hour and ten minutes. Effectively, that last 1.4 percent is likely inconsequential.
I was equally surprised to see how quickly the transition point moves when you decrease charge voltage. As is depicted in the graph above showing charging at 13.9 volts, by decreasing charge voltage by just one tenth of a volt, the transition to absorption or constant voltage charging occurs at 91.2 percent, a full 7.2 percent sooner. I submit that potentially missing out on nearly nine percent of a battery’s capacity is of greater consequence.
What have we learned?
If you took the time to read this article, it is probably because you’re trying to figure out charging settings for your LiFePO4 batteries. So, what conclusions can we draw from the data? Overall, I think we can conclude that a charge setting of 13.9 volts won’t meaningfully impact the capacity of your battery bank. In fact, I suspect you wouldn’t ever notice any difference in capacity. It is possible you will there will be a barely perceptible difference in charge times..
I had some idea that this would be the case, but this testing actually confirms it to an even higher degree than I fugured. I have settled on 13.9 bulk/ absorb and 13.5 float. The next question would seem to be…how does this slightly lower charge voltage affect the cell balancing on a typical drop in with passive balancing over the long term. I have noticed Litime has a similar full chg protection as well. Thanks for all the great testing Ben. Much appreciated.
Ben,
As you know I was working on this exact article but the testing takes time. I had a few more tests to run, this just saved me the time.
I will just point out that it is hard to find a charger that has less than a 1 hour absorption so 13.8V -13.9V is not going to cost you much capacity at all. I knew all this back in 2009 from testing and is how I arrived at 13.8V for absorbing my 12V pack..
Also just realized these graphs say that floating at 13.5 still keeps you very close to full capacity, while floating just one tenth lower at 13.4 has some actual capacity loss. So it appears at least for this battery, to keep SOC meters more in sync and accurate after the full charge cycle has ended, floating at 13.5 would be significantly better than floating at 13.4. Especially if floating for extended periods. I always figured 13.4 or 13.5 for float…whatever. But this data says otherwise.
In addition in conjunction with your last article on the Epoch 460 comms and DVCC, you probably could use the Victron Comms and DVCC (which we know results in a single stage charge profile) and keep the bulk/absorb/float at something like 13.6 or 13.7. I doubt holding these cell at 13.6 or 13.7 would result in adverse effects over the long term and just comes at a cost of charge time. Many manufactures state to float at 13.8. Not that I would prefer that. It would seem you would want to float at the lowest voltage that does not incur meaningful capacity loss. Which according this data is 13.5.
Also just realized these graphs say that floating at 13.5 still keeps you very close to full capacity, while floating just one tenth lower at 13.4 has some actual capacity loss. So it appears at least for this battery, to keep SOC meters more in sync and accurate after the full charge cycle has ended, floating at 13.5 would be significantly better than floating at 13.4. Especially if floating for extended periods. I always figured 13.4 or 13.5 for float…whatever. But this data says otherwise.
In addition and in conjunction with your last article on the Epoch 460 comms and DVCC, you probably could use the Victron Comms and DVCC (which we know results in a single stage charge profile) and keep the bulk/absorb/float at something like 13.6 or 13.7. I doubt holding these cells at 13.6 or 13.7 would result in adverse effects over the long term and just comes at a cost of charge time. Many manufactures state to float at 13.8. Not that I would prefer that. It would seem you would want to float at the lowest voltage that does not incur meaningful capacity loss. Which according this data is 13.5. But holding the cells at 13.7 probably has no adverse effects.
Rod or Ben or anyone…given this data what is your feeling on charging and floating at 13.7 for the Epoch 460 with DVCC back on. It seems odd. But it may in fact be just fine given this narrow window of what voltage constitutes “full” capacity vs what voltage are considered safe in the long term. I do know that many off grid guys do just that at 13.8.
Maybe these Chinese engineers do know a thing or two..lol.
Excellent information Ben!
Thank you for posting this data. Andy from Off Grid Garage has come to very similar conclusions based on his testing.
For the Epoch LFP’s there does not appear to be any advantage to bulk absorption voltages higher than 13.8-13.9 VDC but deciding on the ‘float’ voltage is less clear-cut…
The common wisdom has been that LFP does not do well with the cells held at a continuous 100% SOC. Is this still true?
Assuming the house bank will have to service ongoing loads while a vessel is on shore-power, what is the optimal float voltage to keep the house bank in a good, ready to cast off, SOC?
In other words, What is the maximum safe steady state SOC we should aim for?
I’ve seen very little evidence to support the notion that damage is done or life is shortened by holding LiFePO4 batteries at 100% SOC as long as the voltage isn’t elevated. So, I don’t think any damage is done holding batteries at or near 100% SOC with a 13.4 or 13.5 volt float. Allen asked a question about using a single stage charge at 13.7 volts and personally, I’m not comfortable with that yet.
-Ben S.
Thank you Ben.
I have been playing with a few float settings but it’s been tricky to get a float value that settles reliably into my target of ~ 90% SOC range. If being at or close to 100% SOC at 13.4 V float is OK & not harmful to the cells , that would be excellent and easily achievable.
Could you post the 14.0v to 14.4v curves that you show in the blog for 13.8v and 13.9v? The data might be easier to parse in a table but the time to get to the absorption phase and time in absorption until full (100% SOC) seems like a crucial discriminator for choosing the charge voltage.
I know many like the lower charge voltage for longevity but that seems an optimization that may be much less important to others, but having data to support these “best charge voltage” decisions seems to be the best approach. Thank you.
Thank you for this very valuable info. I know that it took a lot of time and effort to collect and analyze. There are a lot of opinions out there, few of which are grounded in as detailed analysis that you’ve provided. I spent the majority of my career working for the largest test and measurement equipment company and we had a saying which I’ll paraphrase as, “Until you make a measurement, you don’t know what the heck you’re talking about.”
Well done! Looking forward to more of the same.
Thanks for all the work you have done with the 460s which helped a bunch in my new install! Also thanks go out Allen and Jim Duke.
Ben-
Excellent and detailed investigation. As I looked at your data I had to greatly admire the details you had to overcome to collect this data over weeks of effort and then boil it all down. But I have a question. What part does the BMS have to play in this charging scheme? Doesn’t the wide variation in BMS types have a big impact on these measurements? Or are we assuming you are charging “direct” to the cells with no BMS involved? Assuming the BMS plays a role it seems that the small changes in tenths of a volt in Absorb voltage could also be related in part to the BMS control device technology – GaN FETs Vs CMOS etc with different CE (Collector to Emitter) voltage drops could have an impact on how much charge is reaching the cells. Seems like there are huge unknowns running around in the BMS in addition to the specific nature of the LiFePo cells and their varying manufacturing methods.
I have no clue how to resolve these questions. I will say that for now, my poor old brain just wants my WS500 to take care of my $5K investment in my bank of 4 – 8D old fashioned AGMs and all of this research points out that optimizing the capacity and longevity of LiFePo batteries is worthy of years of experiment and discussion.
I can see the benefit of LiFePo on sailboats in particular where there is usually far less room for huge collections of AGMs. The great capacity Vs Volume and weight provides great benefit for modest sailboats. I helped a great friend rig a nice dual AGM (Start – Motoring Battery) and LiFePo (Solar Charged) for sail and at anchor. This dual scheme only required investment in a VE MPPT solar charger and the rest of the gear on his 30HP Diesel and Charger inverter remained the same. Battery switching isolated the loads so that only one type of battery was in use at one time. He is loving it and is happily cruising the Broughton Archipelago in BC Canada now. So long as his VE MPPT keeps his LiFePo going he is happy and will never be aware of all of this research. But if he does see the battery capacity tail off I can refer him to all of this knowledge so he can keep his investment going.
Thanks tons for the work!
The only downside with the “short-charging” is that the BMS has a harder time balancing the cells. The cell differences in capacity show up when reaching full voltage.
So a higher-voltage charge every now & then is still a good idea. Just don’t leave them at high voltage for long periods; just get the voltage up >14.0-14.2 for 30min which should be plenty for balancing if done once a month or so. Then discharge them a bit, and cycle away between 13.0 and 13.8 or whatever, to your heart’s content…
Is this really true though for passive balancing? My Epoch batteries are passive balance. The final balancing that brings the cells into voltage alignment takes place overnight after the charger has been turned off. Active balancing maybe different though. I dont have any experience with it.
I think you might be thinking that the resting cell voltage is what is meant by balanced cells. (“ The final balancing that brings the cells into voltage alignment takes place overnight after the charger has been turned off.“) What you describe is the resting cell voltage (no loads) or the voltage while in the flat portion of the discharge curve which will be approximately equal because of the slope of the curve until the slope steepens near the full discharge limits where the individual cell voltages will diverge like they do in the upper portion of the charge curve.
This near equal cell voltages while not under charge and/or while at rest isn’t the same as the cell voltage delta being at/near 0mV at the end of the absorption phase (steep slope portion of charge curve), which is what is meant by “balanced cells.” The end of absorption phase cell balance is what is important for the battery to achieve routinely to prevent the faster cell achieving overvoltage protections during charging and for overall capacity/lifespan.
With regard to the epoch using the 13.8v absorption, for balanced cells you want to see 3.45v on each cell before you float or turn off the charger. The 3.xx volts you see in the morning on each cell is just the voltage in the flat part of the charge curve. You don’t need to achieve this balanced condition every day, but it should be done routinely (at least monthly).
If the cells are not balanced (at end of absorption cycle) routinely, the energy stored in the battery will be increasingly limited. (The unbalanced cells highest/fastest and lowest/slowest cells define the BMS upper and lower protection limits—not a huge problem if you don’t approach these limits but the cell voltage deviations will increase over time and this can be a challenge for accurate SOC estimations and health of the fast and slow cells as the cells diverge in charge rate and voltage range affecting the useful capacity.
Another way to think about this is you want all the cells to charge to the same voltage at the same rate and you want them to all discharge to the same voltage at the same rate…to be balanced cells. The end voltages define the goals, and it is safer /healthier to use the ending charge voltage rather than the ending discharge voltage as the measure of “balanced.”
(The Victron Smart Lithium battery manual (online pdf) has a nice explanation of cell balancing and the importance of routinely balancing the cells with sufficient time at the top of the absorption cycle. )
Ah, got it. Ok, yes i was confusing the two, that makes perfect sense. I have been charging until i see 3.45 volts per cell and then shutting off the charger at this point. I have been noticing the deviation i think your describing while it gets near the end of charge. The cell voltages do deviate quite a bit and then get to within .005 volts or so when they get near 3.45 volts or 100% SOC, but im not cruising and doing partial charge/discharges. I think I understand Bruce’s comment now and can see how maybe how partial charges/discharges might widen this gap over time.
I am using a Magnum inverter to charge my Epoch 460ah battery and have found that the charge cycle won’t stay in Bulk, but rather quickly switches to Absorb charging with a set charge voltage of 13.8. The current draw early in the Absorb cycle is approximately at my set value of 80 amps (the charge cycle looks very much like a bulk charge even though the Magnum is in Absorb). Later in the charge cycle, as it approaches the full battery capacity, it tapers to zero amps. The Absorb control is only done with a time setting so the display will show Absorb charging at 0 amps. The battery and shunt confirm there is no current being supplied for charging even though the display still shows the absorb cycle is still ongoing. It takes approximately 3 hours to recharge the battery with these settings. I have the final charge on the Magnum set to Silent, so that the charger shuts off completely until I hit my Rebulk setting of 13 volts. If I don’t use the Silent final charge setting but rather use the Float, the rebulk is 12 volts by default and that can’t be changed. Once the charge cycle enters Silent mode, the Magnum will then draw 2.1 amps from the battery to monitor for the next charge cycle that occurs in about 5-6 days. Even though I am using the Custom setup on the Magnum, the settings make it behave like it is CC/CV charging.
Hi Bob,
I only use my Magnum for bulk charging on the generator.
It’s Much simpler to use a reasonably cheap and much more programmable Victron IP22 while on shore power to maintain the Epoch’s while docked at home.
Great article and great analytics Ben. Thank you. Using a bench supply makes sense for this testing. In the real messy boat world of multiple charge sources there are a lot of trade-offs. What I am finding is when charging from alternators (either my 100amp engine alternator or from my 6HP Kubota 12V genset/scuba compressor (homemade setup) if I set the charge voltage to 13.9 vs 14.2, there is a very significant difference in the amps flowing to the batteries. In this case, the charge time difference is grossly exaggerated with lower charge voltages. I am using a alternator regulator that monitors both battery and alternator amps and of course alternator temperature (my improved version of Bill Thomason’s open-source VSR Alternator Regulator). At 13.9 volts, the charging is limited by the voltage. At 14.2, it tends to be more limited by the alternator temperature feedback, while providing a lot more current (almost twice as much). So from a diesel fuel and engine wear perspective, the higher voltage may win. Your thoughts?
Pete,
I can’t say I’ve tested this, but I strongly suspect the issue is the location of voltage measurement. If the alternator is being regulated to produce 13.9 volts at the alternator, you will likely find significantly lower voltage reaching the batteries. I suspect that lower voltage at the batteries is what accounts for the big delta in current acceptance and hence charge times. The bench supply I use has remote voltage sensing. If I use another one that doesn’t, I often have to boost voltage to keep charge acceptance in range.
-Ben S.
Hi Ben, I think I did a poor job of communicating my observations… let me try again. First though, to your comment, of course I am using dedicated, twisted pair, remote voltage sensing for my ‘VSR Mini-Mega Alternator Regulator” (Which is based on the open-source design that became the commercial product known as the WakeSpeed WS-500 which Panbo reviewed a long time ago). (I wouldn’t be much of an EE if I didn’t at least to that…) So back to my observation…
It really boils down to this… assuming the battery can accept both the voltage and current, as a LiFePO4 battery can as compared to a lead-acid battery (Gel, AGM, etc), then as the alternator field current is increased, BOTH the voltage AND current increase from the alternator. So, when we decide to charge at a higher voltage, the alternator will also generate more current, unlike in the fixed-current bench test that you used in your excellent article. So, in the real world, using an alternator, increasing the charge voltage also increases the charge current so the charge time dramatically decreases in more of a geometric curve than a linear one, unlike in the bench test illustration. (Do you disagree?)
Now further, as I use this “VSR” regulator with BOTH battery current and alternator current shunts (whereas most regulators have neither…), I (and the regulator) can see both currents (current to the battery and current from the alternator) and manage the charging accordingly. I therefore also set a battery current limit for the battery bank, an alternator current limit for my 12V genset, and a separate alternator current limit for my engine (that is, with the engine and genset each having their own dedicated VSR regulators). So, back to the real world… I can for example, set the battery charge current limit at 250 amps, the genset alternator current limit at 125 amps, and the engine alternator current limit at 100 amps, leaving another 25 amps of “headroom” for solar charging (250-125-100 = 25). It is, with these settings, then be possible to run both the engine and the genset simultaneously and on a sunny day charge the batteries at a rate of 250 amps, which is still way below the charge current limit specification of the battery bank. And what I find when I test this is exactly that… the alternator controller manages the alternator current at these limits (which, incidentally is also within the capabilities of my alternators without going beyond the thermal roll-off settings I have set on the alternator controllers) and see exactly 125 and 100 amps from the respective alternators and a number a bit higher than that flowing into the batteries when the sun is overhead. Why all alternator controllers don’t work this way is beyond me.
Pete,
Glad to hear you are using remote voltage sensing. With that additional detail layered in, I think you’ve provided a great real world data point about the mix of alternator charging and solar charging. There’s no question that the means of power generation or conversion matters when it comes to understanding the behavior. You’ve provided an important distinction between the toroidal transformer in my bench power supply and rotary power created by an alternator.
In cases, like what your example with alternator charging, where current and voltage move together, I would indeed expect non-linear changes in charge times as they decrease. Frankly, I haven’t been able to do enough controlled testing with alternators to say any more with confidence. I’ve been working to figure out a way to include controlled alternator testing for quite some time. I think it’s high time I step up those efforts!
-Ben S.
Just like Ben’s bench power supply with v-sense, a properly wired voltage regulator will not limit current until absorption voltage is reached.
@Anonymous… Not exactly correct. With MOST regulators which only monitor voltage that’s true. Notice please that the VSR regulator uses not only voltage and temperature sensing but also current shunts on both the battery and the alternator As such, the alternator output is primarily managed to the regulator’s setting value for maximum alternator current, which is secondarily reduced if the setting for alternator temperature is exceeded. Then the battery maximum current is considered (taking into account multiple simultaneous charge sources. And finally the voltage limits the charging cycle stage, taking current down to a float level when the target voltage is achieved. The alternator field current is adjusted using a OID algorithm which Al Thomason developed in open source.
This is the ideal charging regulation which regulators with two shunts cannot possibly achieve.
Edits… PID. Not OID.
“without two shunts*cannot* achieve
Edits… To my comment… PID. Not OID.
“without two shunts*cannot* achieve
I’m using Battleborn LFP batteries and per their technical support the BMS does a top end cell balancing that doesn’t kick in until 14v. They recommend a 14.2-14.4v absorption voltage to ensure cell get balanced. While off the grid I try to get to 100% SOC at least every 2 weeks to ensure cell balancing.
That’s interesting William and very useful for folks with Battleborn batteries to know.
When using the “generic” BMS systems, like the JBD or Overkill Solar brands, they can be set to balance only while charging or while charging/not charging. So folks using “home built” battery banks have more control of things (many, many potential settings besides just this one) and the cells balance pretty much any time they need to.
Good data to know.
In my thinking every 2 weeks seems like a bit much (unless you need 100% of your battery) as charging to 100% isn’t great for your battery so you’re likely to get a little longer lifespan by only charging to 90-95% and balancing a few times a year (unless you’re seeing serious cell voltage drift). With my battery capacity and typical needs I’ve been charging to a bit over 80% and topping things off now and then mainly to make sure my battery meter’s SOC stay in sync.
All that said with the thousands of expected cycles I don’t think topping off batteries or holding your batteries at 100% or 80% or storing them at 50% is going to be critical… calendar aging is likely to be the main factor in many cases.
Are you charging the Epoch with the Balmer MC-618? If so would you share what parameters you are using with it? I took the leap and have installed two Epoch 300Ah and in the process of upgrading from an MC-614 + DuoCharge to an MC-618 + DuoCharge in a system that was all AGM. Now will be house lithium with single AGM charged by the DuoCharge.
Belay that – I’ve programmed an MC-618 to charge the pair of Epoch v2 300Ah using the 13.9/13.5 parameters – will report back. Also have solar and shore victron programmed with the same.
Rob, I’m about to upgrade my house bank next month to lithium from AGM and sound like I have a similar setup, with a MC-614 (170A Balmar alternator) and a pair of DuoCharge devices going to the start and windlass batteries. (I’ll be charging the lithium with the alternator, and installing a ArgoFET to provide load dump protection.) My question to you is what setting(s) are you using on the DuoCharge going to the AGM?
What is your understanding of the operation of the DuoCharge? Isn’t it simply a 30A limited electronic automatic charging ‘relay’, and not a true DC-DC charger with charging profiles? While it has different battery chemistry settings, I think it just changes the cut-in voltage, and doesn’t change a profile. If you’re only bulking the lithium to 13.9, and floating at 13.5, I “believe” that’s the maximum voltage that the AGM will see, which is nothing close to the absorption voltage that AGMs want to see, and certainly not the duration. Or, do you have a higher bulk/absorption voltage on a solar MPPT to help satisfy AGMs desire for a higher voltage?
If anyone else wants to chime in on the Balmar Digital DuoCharge’s operation, and suggested configuration, please do so!
The DuoCharge can step down voltage but not step it up. I’ve been running for a while with the lower voltages mentioned in this article but it has led, I think, to under charging my AGM starter (fortunately I have an emergency switch to use the house to start). I’ve changed both the DuoCharge (which feeds the engine AGM) and the MC-618 (which feeds the pair of 300Ah Epoch house) to the voltages in the Epoch manual: 14.2 Bulk/Absorb, 13.6 Float/Storage. My thinking is 14.2 should be enough to keep the AGM up as the West Marine label says charging from 13.8 to 14.6. More specifically I set the DuoCharge to its default AGM and then lowerred the High Voltage to 14.2. Hopefully the AGM will come back to life with the increase from 13.9 to 14.2 voltage charging. Many AGM’s specify higher charging voltages in which case it would be better to get an actual DC to DC (ie Victron Orion) that can step up to the required AGM starter voltage leaving the alternator regulator to serve the lower Lithium voltages. If in fact this doesn’t work on my AGM starter then I’ll probably switch out the DuoCharge for an Orion…
I’ve called Balmar and they’ve confirmed that it’s essentially a Automatic Charging Relay. It does not have any charging profiles. It simply sets cut-in and cut-out voltages of the “relay”. Essentially, any time the voltage is above 13.0V, it will “provide charging current to the starting battery”. So, with the input connected to a house lithium bank, and with lithium resting voltage around 13.5V, the DDC will always be connected to the load (start battery, windlasss battery, etc.), regardless of charging or not, any time the lithium voltage is above about 13.0V. When I spoke to Balmar, they never thought about that and concurred that I was right in thinking that I should raise the setting of the lower voltage on the DDC to around that 13.5V so that the lead isn’t ‘charging’ if nothing is charging the lithium. The not so good news with the charging sources (other than the DDC) set to a lithium profile, it will get to 14.2V, but will very quickly drop down to 13.5V float once 14.2V is achieved. Lead likes to be held at that 14.2+V absorption stage for 2-3 hours, not just 5-15 minutes. Yes, it would appear that the best thing to do would be to switch to a DC-DC charger if the AGMs die again with this sub-optimum charging method. I’m hoping with a solar daily brief bulking of the lithium to 14.2 and floating at 13.5, that the AGMs will find it acceptable, although not optimum.
So the underlying prismatic cells are catl I believe, and in their guidance it looks to double the rated capacity of the cells by restricting the charge down to 80% (6000 cycles). I am charging to 13.34v and cutting out on my epoch as that’s kinda where I calculated 80% to be. I’ll never even hit the rated cycle count based on how seldom I use my boat, but Im going down this path anyways.
The Roy Pow built Epochs use Eve cells. Not charging to upper 13s or 14 volts means no balancing will occur in the battery. To me, that’s a much greater concern than ticking off a cycle. 3,000 cycles is one cycle a day for 300 out of 365 days a year for TEN years.
-Ben S.
I think both strategies make sense though depends on use case. I figure most LFP batteries will likely loose capacity from calendar aging rather than excessive use so are we’re splitting hairs here?
My thinking is if you’re out on your boat and/or likely to need over 80% or 90% then definitely charge to 100% (which you’ll likely get because your batteries are fully balanced). When not cruising I’ve been charging/holding my batteries around 80% and so far they are staying balanced. I know this because I do top off before a cruise or when I want to make sure my SOC is in sync/accurate.
Do you sleep better knowing that your cells are balanced within 0.4% rather than 1.9% of each other or that in 10yrs you’ll be getting 94% of their rated capacity or 92%? Seems either way is fine and I do like seeing 100% charge. Maybe this concern is left over from old lead acid habits/debates … fun to talk about. I’m still amazed how much better these batteries are than my old lead ones… as long as I don’t trickle charge them at a high voltage.
Splitting hairs? Probably! But, it’s not about achieving balance for balance’s sake. During normal operations, the most common (though that doesn’t make it common) cause of a disconnect is a cell going over or under voltage. If the cells aren’t balanced, that likelihood increases. Every battery is going to have laggard and runner cells, the variances may be small. But if they aren’t corrected, over time the delta will get larger and potentially large enough to trip a protection parameter in the battery. On the water, that’s an undesirable outcome.
-Ben S.
Excellent safety point though if any cell is regularly drifting more than just a few % out of balance there may be larger issues at hand – like poor quality cells or charging/discharging at too high of a C rate for the battery.
At the 100% risk of repeating myself, for those who want to set and forget, 100% charge definitely seems like they way to go (I would say required method if you can’t track the individual cell voltages in your battery).
The other approach requires more attention/time – keeping the SOC between 15-85% and only balancing as needed (but well ahead of any significant imbalance). aka, baby them.
In my experience topping off / balancing once every few months has been more than enough but you mileage may vary. (This attention to detail absolutely seem like overkill to me but since I have a computer onboard which monitors & logs the battery state in an influx database, automatically ‘tops off’ to 85% weekly – and remotely can charge to 100% whenever I want I have fun with it all. I do enjoy seeing my cell voltages within something like 0.008v of each other a 100% SOC)
Short version: typical boater, just keep your cells balanced/topped off – if you still have them in 10 years you likely won’t even notice the few % capacity loss, if there is any. For those who have too much time on their hands & baby them, in 10yrs (even if your cells are 2-3% out of balance), you may get slightly more power from your battery than someone who balanced everyday. Either way we’ll have something to talk about … sure beat this one today 😉
I tried new charging parameters this last cycle changing the charge voltage from 13.8 to 14 volts. Unfortunately I don’t have a way to log what was happening but I believe one cell ran away and the BMS shut down the charging because my Magnum still showed absorb charging but at zero amps. My cells were pretty well out of balance compared to when I charge with 13.8 with around 5% difference between the high and low. I have since gone back to my normal charge at 13.8 volts.
Sorry, didn’t notice I didn’t identify myself when I submitted my comment.
Bob T
5% individual cell voltage deviation (.17v) at any part of the charge cycle (at end of absorption, or worse, after end of absorption at float or when at rest) signals that your cells really need to be balanced—badly. As you found, the “runner” likely hit a protection (full charge, or cell over voltage (OVP)) when you pushed it a small amount further. Should you not manage the cell balance,— long absorption at 13.8v where each cell, at the end of absorption, is fully balanced (3.45v each—some call this full full full) you will likely run into this same behavior at 13.8v charging (OVP) as the runner and laggard diverge.
Even a much smaller deviation should be corrected and managed. One LFP maker recommends 8 hours in absorption monthly is a good rule of thumb (and they use passive AND active balancing). Even though passive balancing works, it only works well when there are small charging currents as the bleed resistors are relatively small compared to the charging pressure until the current tapers.
Cheers
Thanks for the input. How do I balance the cells with my Magnum, is it just a matter of leaving in absorb for an extended period? I did leave it in float for a month only because I didn’t want to cycle the Magnum in the extreme heat, now that it’s cooled off I am not using float but silent (Magnum won’t charge until it hits the rebulk setting). I did see when in float for that period the cells were getting farther apart. When it comes off of a charge the cells balance fairly quickly.
Hi Bob,
I have a Magnum charger but only use it for its bulk charging capabilities (CC/CV) while on the generator and it’s in use as my inverter off grid.
Its charging programmability is otherwise too limited.
While on shore power, I use a Victron IP22 charger that is fully programmable and can use the Smartshunt data (BMV 700) to guide its parameters. The IP22 is quite cheap but very customizable as to bulk, absorption, float & storage parameters.
(I actually have 3 of these IP22’s in parallel for increasing capacity on the generator but only keep one in service while on shore power.)
This all works very well.
Not sure if you saw my comment below, curious if you have any issues with the CC/CV setup? It basically operates the same as the way I have my Custom setup with a charge finish of Silent. I have thought about using a separate charger for the lithium, but haven’t sorted out how to set it up since my battery is in an RV and the Magnum is hard wired to the transfer switch. I might be able to set the Magnum charge parameters out of range of actual charging so it doesn’t start a charge cycle allowing the Victron to handle the charging.
The CC/CV Profile works very well for bulk charging when needed (ie maximum output when charging on the generator); but, I turn off the Magnum charging when the boat is on shore power leaving this to the 30A Victron IP22’s.
Bob, you must have a very old magnum inverter/charger as I have one from within the last 4 years and can set custom battery charging parameters. With 12x50Ahr24v battery bank I set bulk voltage at 28.8v and 2 hr absorption. I was originally having the charger go into silent mode and rebulk at 26.2v but now I just float at 26.4v which generally keeps the SOC at about 60%. If going out cruising the 190 amp alternator brings to 100% SOC with only 1-2hrs cruise.
My Magnum is now 10 years old. I do have it set on custom, but it only stays in bulk for a very short time and most of the charging is done in absorb when set at 13.8 charge voltage (that’s why I tried the higher charge voltage of 14 volts). I believe this is because it doesn’t have separate voltage sensing and it misreads the voltage when the current is high. The battery and my shunt definitely show lower voltage when the current is high in the early charging. The absorb charging is done at the higher current (I have it set for 80% or 80 amps) which then tapers down as the battery reaches full charge. I have spoken with Magnum and they stated what the charger is doing is normal.
I will need to put it back in float prior to our trip because I can’t let it get too low prior to departure since my alternator charging is limited by the Victron DC-DC charger. Although it will charge at 30 amps, depending on what we have for current draws, I may not get a full 30amps to the battery if there are other DC draws on the alternator.
Just think that well within ten years the lipo’s will be an obsolete storage battery. Then those that can will get the latest. This is very dynamic industry. I have been working in battery/ev technology for over 60 years so have learned patience and worry over batteries is not really worth too much. I applaud this research but enjoy your boat especially if it sails.
Really helpful and thorough research, same goes for the comments, thank you very much. I’ll be ammending my absorption and float rates as a result of your work.
Hello Ben,
Very useful information – thanks very much!!
Do you know the balancing requirements for the Epoch 460? I think it is top end, passive balancing but I have not been able to confirm this with Epoch (they always say “we’ll get back to you right away” but never do).
The big question is requirements for a charge source while balancing. Will this battery balance if it is charged to some level and then the battery is disconnected (say by a battery switch)? The motivation for this: there are some devices on the market that claim to intelligently parallel lead acid with LFP. One of the characteristics is to disconnect the LFP, based on terminal voltage sensing, via a contactor. I suppose this might be OK if the battery will perform cell balancing while in this disconnected state.
The Epoch 460 is passive/shunt balancing..
Terrific article! Any thoughts on using a fixed 13.5 volt setting on my Kisae Inverter/Charger for shore power? It doesn’t provide the ability to set specific values and so my only other option is to go with the lithium preset options with absorb at 14.2 (or higher) and float always at 13.8. I also have Victron MPPT and DC-DC chargers for solar and alternator power that I can configure more precisely and use to deliver a higher absorb charge.