Autorouting: Navionics new Dock-to-Dock kicks it up a big notch

Navionics_Dock-to-Dock_AR_Gloucester_cPanbo.jpgLet’s end 2015 with some new technology that will really make a difference, I think. It’s Navionics’ new Dock-to-dock autorouting system, and it may not be getting the recognition it deserves because Navionics already offered autorouting that was only marginally useful (like the others I’ve tried). Dock-to-dock is not perfect, but it still strikes me as a quantum leap improvement that many boaters are going to appreciate…

Raymaine_Navionics_auto_routing_issues_cPanbo.jpgI first tried Navionics original autorouting algorithms when they became a $10 option in its Boating app and then again when Raymarine integrated the Navionics feature into its Lighthouse MFD software. Like Garmin and C-Map autorouting, it was okay at finding the shortest path in fairly open waters, but it didn’t honor navigation buoys and it often choked up completely when challenged with narrow passages. In fact, I was pretty happy when Navionics autorouting on a Raymarine MFD was able to plot a course from off Gloucester through the Cape Cod Canal, even though it exited the buoyed channel sooner than I would have and also showed shallow water warnings just because it routed too close to the shallows. Plus, by the time I captured the screens above, I’d already given up on trying to get the algorithms to guide me into tricky Cataumet Harbor (also known as Pocasset or Red Brook Harbor, and a place I’d never navigated before). At least I got an ETA to the harbor entrance!

Navionics_Dock-to-Dock_Catumet_cPanbo.jpgSo it was great to see the new Dock-to-dock algorithms lay out a sensible route all the way from Gloucester inner harbor to the Kingman Marina deep in Cotaumet. You can see the entire 66 nautical mile route in the top screenshot, as well as the useful list of Cataumet points of interest that Dock-to-dock puts up after the calculations. In the image above you can see how the algorithms nicely negotiated both the big commercial channel and the snaky harbor entrance. I can testify that the various Shallow Water warnings are justified here, though I don’t quite get routing you near a buoy and then warning you about hitting it. But extra warnings are trivial when all other previous autorouting algorithms would have either refused to do this route at all or would have created one that needed a lot of repairs. Dock-to-dock solved the problem almost exactly like I would have after years of routing experience, but while I was doing something else!

Navionics_Dock-to-Dock_AR_Gloucester_setup_cPanbo.jpgThere’s lots to like about the Dock-to-dock process as well. Your route can start where you are or where you can easily search for a starting marina or other POI, just as you can for a destination like Kingman Yacht Center. You can also see the Boat Settings that Dock-to-dock works with and tap to change them. Draft has a lot to do with how the algorithms think — we will see more about that below — and of course expected cruising speed and fuel consumption are critical to Dock-to-dock’s estimated trip time and fuel use calculations.

Navionics_Dock-to-Dock_AR_Gloucester2_cPanbo.jpgYou can also easily edit a Dock-to-dock route after the calculations, or later. (And if the route you’re returning to was originally made manually, you’re given the choice of keeping it manual or turning it into automated.) In the case above I was completely redoing the Gloucester to Cotaumet route on my wife’s iPad Air to see if it was much faster than what happened on my own 1st generation iPad mini. Dock-to-dock is much faster on the newer Air, and is probably much faster still on the latest generation of iPads (comparisons here). My added waypoint #1 is simply there to give me a heads up to the shipping channel, but #2 is to correct a relatively small glitch I saw regularly in Dock-to-dock…

Navionics_Dock-to-Dock_edit_cPanbo.jpgWhile Dock-to-dock algorithms definitely take into account navigation aids that form a channel, they don’t always do well with lateral aids. So while there was enough water depth to route Gizmo between Mary Ann rocks and the big buoy that guard them, I’d rather not. This is a universal problem with autorouting in my experience, but with Dock-to-dock it’s very easy to tap a waypoint onto the automated path and drag it where you want it and then sit back while legs are recalculated. (Yes, I did insert The Mary Ann waypoint first, but when I created the shipping channel waypoint, the numbers automatically reordered so that the leg time/length data display makes better sense.)

Navionics_Dock-to-Dock_Cam-NE_cPanbo.jpgWhile I’ve yet to use Dock-to-dock underway, I have tried it in many places and especially along the complicated but very familiar coast of Maine. The results are usually very similar to what I’d do myself (with much more work). That Camden to Northeast Harbor route above, for instance, is good enough for heavy fog conditions in the Deer Isle Thoroughfare and Casco Passage as is. The four adjustments I made were not absolutely necessary: an unmarked ledge I’d rather give more berth, a lateral buoy I’d rather honor, and the fact that tidal currents can make deep-enough Bass Harbor Bar pretty frisky.

Navionics_Dock-to-Dock_NE_marinas_cPanbo.jpgWhen you tap on a Dock-to-dock POI category, the chart zooms into your destination and highlights the results. That’s great, but this screen also demonstrates how Navionics often shows multiple versions of the same marina or whatever. This may be because I have Community Edits enabled, but in this case even the crowdsourced info isn’t very good. The Northeast Harbor harbormaster (no surprise) works out of the publicly owned Northeast Harbor Marina, and the spot where the harbormaster is mistakenly marked is actually Asticou Dock (which is a good place to know about).

Navionics_Dock-to-Dock_deep_draft_cPanbo.jpgThis screen collage shows some experimentation I did around the mouth of Chesapeake Bay. Setting Gizmo’s draft to 29.9 feet was actually a mistake – I meant 9.9 feet – but it worked. When using my real draft, Dock-to-dock tended to route me too close to Cape Charles for my taste – and the original Navionics autorouting did worse – but this setup merged me into the shipping channel that I prefer to use (at least along its edge). What I really appreciated, though, is that Dock-to-dock still guided me up the channel into Hampton and even under the bridge to the uncharted anchorage area I like. The dashed red route line may indicate the highest caution, perfectly appropriate for a 30 foot draft of this area, but that’s way better than an error message and having to go to complete manual mode. (By the way, Dock-to-dock does not deal with bridge heights like that sorry-sailors 29-foot Hampton bridge – see bottom of this entry – but it does give you a bridge clearance warning.)

Navionics_Dock-to-Dock_AR_too_many_points_2_cPanbo.jpgI did find a way to break Dock-to-dock, however, and that’s the awesomely twisty and shallow New Jersey ICW. Even with draft reduced to 2 feet, the algorithms couldn’t seem to handle a route longer than about 13 miles without generating the dreaded “too many points” error message. But, heck, you’ll soon see that Garmin’s well-regarded autorouting can be similarly frustrating in the deeper, simpler ICW that many more cruising boats use.

Navionics_Boating_Android_w_Dock-to-Dock_cPanbo.jpgBut before we go there, here’s the most recent version of Android Navionics Boating US & Canada running on my phone. Autorouting is not supported on this platform yet, but Navionics cloud syncing means that even my auto calculated Camden to Northeast Harbor route is available, though now it has at least 100 waypoints. So it goes, and it was nice to see that the diminished feature set is reflected in a mere $8 Navionics+ annual subscription rate. Dock-to-dock was included in my iOS Boating US HD iPad app’s $30 annual subscription – which still seems fair given this, a huge chart area, and a whole lot of other features – and in fact it’s working fine even though the subscription has expired. As navigation aids and shoals change, though, a Freshest Data subscription should make Dock-to-dock work better, so mission accomplished?

Garmin_auto_routing_issues_cPanbo.jpgAny discussion of autorouting should at least mention Garmin because they really trailblazed this feature (and I’ve been told it’s very popular with Garmin users). I enjoyed the original a lot; it made mistakes that couldn’t be corrected, but it was great for quick, if rough, ETA’s and a general sense of where to go. Auto Guidance 2.0 is much improved, but I still managed to capture screenshots of it cutting inside navigation aids and refusing to route a skinny part of the ICW (even though the same MFD had a pertinent track of Gizmo making the same passage). Autorouting waterways is hard.

Navionics_webinar_cPanbo.jpgTo learn more about Dock-to-dock autorouting, and also the bigger concept Navionics calls Mediamorphosis, check out this recent webinar (skip to 19:40 if you just want to see Giuseppe Carnevale’s live Dock-to-dock demo). One feature I have not yet been able to try, for instance, is Dock-to-dock’s ability to warn a user about speed limits and even include them in ETA calculations. Also, note on the webinars screen capture above that Dock-to-dock is slated to come “Soon on Raymarine”…

Raymarine_preview_dock_to_dock2_cPanbo.jpgIn fact, “soon” may be real soon. Raymarine was demonstrating a beta version of Dock-to-dock on one of their multifunction displays at METS, as illustrated on the screens above and below. Yes, Ray even has the algorithms plotting a course right into a tight marina (lower left below), though caution is advised. I hope I’ve made the point in this entry that caution should always be taken. Autoroutes are potentially a great convenience, but they must always be checked.

At any rate, I’m quite excited about having Dock-to-dock working on a Raymarine MFD, and of course that may also be eventually possible on Navico MFD’s that support Navionics chart cards. What’s more, if Dock-to-dock catches on like I think it will, Garmin and C-Map will likely be motivated to improve their autorouting. It’s all good.

Happy new year to all.


Ben Ellison

Ben Ellison

Panbo editor, publisher & chief bottlewasher from 4/2005 until 8/2018, and now pleased to have Ben Stein as a very able publisher, webmaster, and editing colleague. Please don't regard him as an "expert"; he's getting quite old and thinks that "fadiddling fumble-putz" is a more accurate description.

16 Responses

  1. Hendrik says:

    Happy 2016 Ben.
    Keep em coming

  2. Dan Corcoran (b393capt) says:

    Happy New Year Ben and all readers of this great blog.

  3. Quitsa says:

    I store my boat at Kingman over the winter and consequently have been in and out of Cataumet many times (in fact I just heard from my boat over there – the Siren Marine monitoring system sent me a text with a “low temperature alert” because the yard unplugged my shore power for the holiday break when no one would be around and it cold cold last night).
    The autoroute took roughly the same track that I laboriously plotted several years back. The aids to navigation shown on the inset as you get close to Kingman are privately maintained and do move around a little.
    Another quibble is that there is no indication that the last 1/4 mile in Red Brook Harbor takes you through a very dense mooring field that must have 200 boats in the summer.
    I do worry about this technology in the hands of inexperienced operators. Probably a double edged sword, however, as it will help many of them find safer routes than they might choose on their own.
    Happy New Year and keep up the great work.

  4. First Last says:

    Your little “quibble” reinforces the adage, “To keep a proper lookout”.

  5. Quitsa says:

    I am slightly amazed that with all of the class action lawyers lurking to pounce that the manufacturers are even willing to sell auto routing in the US. One can only imagine the litigation if someone had engaged autorouting and ran themselves into danger and suffered injuries or death. Sure, we all know that under maritime law it would likely be 100% their own responsibility but that never stops the lawyers.

  6. George says:

    Pretty cool. Do you know if it deals with traffic separation schemes? I would be really impressed if it came up with the proper ninety degree crossing of a traffic lane.
    I would be super duper impressed if it handled the notorious area WG in B.C. which is a live torpedo testing range that gets hundreds of boaters in trouble each year. It lies across the best route for boats headed to Desolation Sound or Alaska. If you cross it when it is active you will have helicopters and armed patrol boats chasing you. If raymarine came up with a WG warning the Canadians would be most grateful. To make things interesting there are several marked regions in the area so it is not so easy ro discern on a chartplotter…

  7. Norton Rider says:

    Autorouting can be a useful tool if properly employed. I teach the USPS/CPS Electronic Navigation Systems Class and I recommend to students that they carefully go over the routes that they create before actually using them for navigation. The same should apply to automatically created routes.

  8. Scott Zeien says:

    Kingman regrets that your shore power went out over the holiday week. We experienced a power outage on the street and the neighborhood was down. Apparently your boat’s systems did not restart when power was restored.

  9. Quitsa says:

    Thanks for the personal service! The power is not yet back at least to my boat. Maybe the breaker tripped on the panel.

  10. Paul Lever says:

    If you auto-route between Point A and Point B vs between Point B and Point A do you get the same course? There should be some bias in the routes so that you do not encourage Chartplotter assisted collisions.

  11. Waterford says:

    I just entered a route between Nanaimo and Half-moon Bay and it does not route around WG.

  12. Ian Threlfall says:

    Raymarine has just released Lighthouse V16 – unfortunately Dock to Dock is not included … patience is a virtue!

  13. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Thanks for the news, Ian…
    …though lack of Dock-to-Dock is a disappointment, hopefully just short term.
    Then again, it may nicely illustrate why C-Map’s new close relationship with Navico may eventually mean faster, more reliable cartography feature integration:

  14. Tcy says:

    And that is the reason why Garmin uses its own mapping and not someone else’s. Garmin has had auto guidance for ten years now and finally another brand made a copy. Also the way Garmin makes its waypoints and routes is getting copyed now by Raymarine.
    Is my love for Garmin so wrong?

  15. I spent the last two weekends using auto routing both on Navionics on the iPad, and via Navionics charts on my Raymarine eS78. I agree with Ben that while it made some good routes, I ended up saying “I’d rather not” in a number of cases where it cut really close to shore, or other things that I just don’t do for safety’s sake.
    Wrote up a little bit about it in a recent blog post at

  16. My system won’t autoroute. I’ve got a brand new Raymairine Axiom Plus and inserted a Navionics Platinum :lus mSD. Everything works except the autoroute. It just draws a straight line from point to point without any regard to hazards etc. I updated the navionics card before inserting it.
    Any thoughts??

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *