SiMON2, for iPad & “smaller” yachts

Ben Ellison

Ben Ellison

Panbo editor, publisher & chief bottlewasher from 4/2005 until 8/2018, and now pleased to have Ben Stein as a very able publisher, webmaster, and editing colleague. Please don't regard him as an "expert"; he's getting quite old and thinks that "fadiddling fumble-putz" is a more accurate description.

12 Responses

  1. John K says:

    Not exactly on topic but….
    As someone who missed out on the unlimited data plan for the 3G model
    I have been looking for a way to avoid getting locked into ATT’s 2Gig limit.
    Last night I was looking through the specs and noticed that they show it operating on the following bands: UMTS/HSDPA (850, 1900, 2100 MHz) GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz). I could have sworn that when it first came out I read it was on 850 only thereby locking you in to ATT. Is this different now or has it always been this way? I believe that T-Mobile is on 1900 so would a cut down to mini size T-Mobile Sim work on this now? I know very little about this stuff so is there any glaring reason why this won’t work? I don’t own an iPad or have a T-Mobile account yet so this would be an expensive experiment if it didn’t work. Thanks.

  2. Adam says:

    Ben, I didn’t realize that Maretron was counting on Flash-on-iOs for their N2KView iPhone/iPad port. That’s a shame, since had they started with native XCode they’d be done with the iPad by now, and working on Android. But I guess they put their eggs in the AIR basket. Not sure I consider that choice a win yet (from the end-user perspective anyway), given the problems I’ve had with the AIR version of N2KView, but I don’t know the inside story over there. And since I’m about to try N2KView on OSX, which wouldn’t be possible without the AIR effort, I guess I shouldn’t complain.
    Seems I should get back to work on my generic 0183-over-TCP/IP marine instruments iPhone app!

  3. Marc says:

    I don’t think the iPad will work with T-Mobile. I think T-Mobile uses the 1700mhz for UMTS/HSDPA.
    You can look on wikipedia or here:

  4. Dan Corcoran (b393capt) says:

    With Amazon just released a new version of the Kindle that supports wi-fi for $139 including a browser, I wonder if using a Kindle as an instrument display is as easy as a wi-fi connection to a laptop computer that can serve up web-pages with an instrument display? Maybe AIR would even support serving up the Maretron display?

  5. Adam says:

    Dan, with due respect, I can’t imagine anything more annoying than trying to look at constantly changing instrument data on an E-ink display. They’re just no good for non-static content.

  6. Dan Corcoran (b393capt) says:

    I can. 10 frames per second is no good for full motion video, but for instrument displays (e.g. not chartplotters) I believe e-ink could easily meet most boaters needs, where 4 or even 2 frames per second would be fine.

  7. Paul says:

    $800 for an IPad, limited connectivity, marine environment, hmmm.
    $125 for a 7″ color touch Android tablet, now you’re talking.

  8. Adam says:

    It’s not the frame rate that bothers me; it’s the flashing. Have you noticed that each time you turn a page on your kindle it flashes to reverse video (white on black) for a fraction of a second? If this artifact couldn’t be engineered away I wouldn’t want to use it for instruments.

  9. Adam says:

    Paul, okay, point taken, but iPad isn’t $800 — it’s $499 or $629 for the 3G version.

  10. Anonymous says:

    The IPad ranges from $500 to $800. Its a fine piece of kit. But what bothers me more re: suitability for marine electronics is its lack of connectivity options.
    I’m liking what I’m seeing coming in the Android space. Expect to see many options in more reasonably priced (dare say throw away) Android based tablets with much better connectivity options (USB ports, etc).

  11. Peter says:

    Let’s not get all down on the iPad….it just came out…Rev 1.0, remember? Steve will see or imagine something while taking a shower and we’ll soon have the “iWetPad”. Seriously.
    My opinion: touchscreens will be the norm. iPads will just be the sexiest of them.
    Always consider Moore’s Law before you bitch out something… just wait, it’ll change.
    Always does

  12. Anonymous says:

    Peter. Suggest you do some comparison with Android 1.x tablets versus IPad 1.x, then you will understand my comments. IPad is short on connectivity options and a relatively closed software ecosystem (versus Android). If history is a guide, the IPad will remain a relatively closed system.
    As a former product designer of several award winning marine electronics products, I’m very well versed in ‘bitchin’ about Moore’s law, thank you.

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published.