WIF-Pro’s water in fuel monitors, keeping a watch on your fuel

Ben Stein

Ben Stein

Publisher of Panbo.com, passionate marine electronics enthusiast, 100-ton USCG master.

6 Responses

  1. Jeff Robbins Jeff Robbins says:

    What a great idea! I too have had my share of WIF and this looks like a very complete and well thought out solution. Using an infrared sensor means little chance for failure and no way of introducing leaks too. Well done. However for a small boat like mine the N2K version, which I do think is great, is probably overkill but I’ll be on the lookout for the indicator kit

  2. While this appears to be a well designed product, I don’t think it adds much to what is already available in the market at much lower cost. For modern Diesel common rail engines, water in fuel sensing is a matter of life and death because even tiny amounts of water can blow the tips off very expensive injectors. Fuel injected gasoline engines are not quite as vulnerable but also are sensitive to water. Consequently, engine manufacturers require WIF sensors, which are often linked to the engine control systems. My Cummins QSB motors won’t even start if the WIF sensor is triggered. The sensors sold by Racor and others that screw into fittings on the bowl are a fraction of the cost and alarm through the engine instrumentation.

    Perhaps there are some old engines out there for which this is a good solution. But for newer engines, I don’t see it as cost effective.

    • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:

      Fred,

      Everyone has to make their own evaluation about value and I don’t presume to substitute my analysis for yours. However, I will mention that while WIF alerting is pretty common on diesel engines, I believe it’s much less common on gasoline powered outboards. In fact, the Racor clear bowls for gasoline filters don’t have the casting for the sensor to screw in. I really like the fact that WIFPro monitors without inserting anything into the bowl creating the possibility of leaks. Plus, with an explosive fuel, a lot of potential issues are avoided by not inserting anything into the bowl. Whether that’s worth the price of the units… only the boat owner can decide that for themselves.

      -Ben S.

      • Good points. Probably I sounded too negative to be honest because the product seemed to be an excellent solution to a problem that has been solved many times before. Racor does make replacement plastic bowl kits with water in fuel sensors that can be retrofitted on gasoline powered boats that did not previously have sensors. They are pretty cheap but require some expertise to rig on a boat that does not have an ECM set up to use it and report the warnings through the engine gauges. Also I would note that the traditional sensor probe at the bottom of the bowl in a port would likely be triggered by a smaller amount of water than this design. Personally, I would not want to wait until there was enough water in the bowl to float a probe. Then again I have triple filters on my Diesel engines because the consequences of having any water to get to the injectors in a high pressure common rail engine are so severe. Not really overkill if you run 100 miles offshore to fish and don’t want to paddle home.

  3. Mark Thomas says:

    Review the requirements for gasoline fuel system components. The plastic bowls are a red flag!

    • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:

      For outboard powered boats, I don’t believe there is any problem with plastic clear bowls. For U.S. flagged boats, ABYC H24 covers gasoline fuel systems. Here’s the text of H24.5.7 that covers fire resistance, the driver behind plastic bowls being problematic. Pay careful attention to exception 6:

      24.5.7 All individual components of the fuel system, as installed in a boat, shall be capable of withstanding a 2.5 minuteexposure to free burning fuel (N-Heptane) without leakage as required by Title 33 CFR, Section 183.590, and as required for individual components in H-24 (see APPENDIX 2).

      EXCEPTIONS:
      1. Portions of fuel distribution systems located outside the engine compartment if a break at any point in this system will result in the discharge of no more than five ounces (147.9 ml) of fuel in 2.5 minutes, including fuel that may drain from the engine (see H- 24.17 for requirements for fuel distribution and return systems).
      2. Self-draining fill and vent pipes located in a separate compartment from the engine compartment.
      3. Fill and vent external fittings.
      4. Clips and straps not essential for antisiphon protection required by this standard.
      5. The outboard engine manufacturer-supplied manual primer bulbs and hose or equivalent to the engine, if the boat is not fitted with a gasoline (petrol) inboard engine or generator set.
      6. Gasoline (petrol) fuel filters designed and labeled for marine use on outboard powered boats, provided the boat is not fitted with a gasoline (petrol) inboard engine or generator set and the filter is located in a compartment that is open to the atmosphere or void of ignition sources (see ABYC E-11, AC & DC Electrical Systems on Boats). NOTE: SeeH- 24.17.9.1.7 for additional fire testing requirements for remote fuel pump systems.24.5.8 A means to determine fuel level or quantity shall be provided.24.5.9 Fuel systems shall be designed to meet engine vacuum requirements and pressure drop to ensure proper and reliable engine compatibility.24.6FLEXIBLE FUEL HOSE24.6.1Hose shall comply with the requirements of SAE J1527, Marine Fuel Hose.EXCEPTION: Outboard engine manufacturer-supplied hose or equivalent from the outboard engine primer bulbto the outboard engine with a permeation rate of 15 g/m²/24 hr or less, if the boat is not fitted with a gasoline (petrol) inboard engine or generator set.

      -Ben S.

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *