SIONYX Nightwave Digital, strong low light performance with better integration

Ben Stein

Ben Stein

Publisher of Panbo.com, passionate marine electronics enthusiast, 100-ton USCG master.

3 Responses

  1. Baylor Fooks says:

    I’ve installed three Nightwave Digital cameras, two on Simrad vessels and one on a Garmin vessel. Even after updating software on the MFDs and Nightwave I still had trouble with the initial setup. In two cases the customers had to call me to return to the boat to re-setup the camera. For instance, the Simrad NSX vessel auto-created a camera instance which didn’t work, and could not be deleted. Since it was there the customer and named “NIGHTWAVE DIGITAL” the customer selected it. The issue appeared to be TCP/IP addressing and name resolution issues–hurdles land-based IT products overcame years ago. I think there’s room for improvement in both the camera software and MFD implementations for IP video.

  2. You had me quite worried when I saw this review posted. I bought a Sionyx Nightwave Digital about two weeks ago and of course I was concerned that you might find it underwhelming. My purpose was to be able to leave well before dawn to fish offshore without it being quite so nerve-wracking as I dodge the numerous lobster traps in our area.

    So far I have not used it except to bench test at home using an iPad to display the image. I should have my boat in a couple of days. Then I will be able to comment on its ease of integration with Furuno MFDs (the manufacturer says it should be fine) as well as its performance in our relative dark conditions. We have very little in the way of light pollution because of the low density of development in our town and a quite strict “dark sky” bylaw that prohibits most outdoor lighting except for satefy related path lights, which must be shaded to ensure the light is only directed downwards. Consequently we have very nice views of the Milky Way even in summer.

  3. Moose says:

    i have been playing around with a Infravision Nano c (FORMERLY OMNISENSE) as it was IP with easy intergration with navico, garmin etc …originally i was planning on IRIS Photons, though its pretty hard to get those out of the UK and needing to use a CMAC module for garmin was a bit of a cost barrier.
    The Nano C’s performance so far has been underwhelming and not as good as the sionyx analog on a Simrad NSS evo3s.. however connected to my laptop its performance is much better. i feel like IP camera solutions do require a fair bit of processing power and the evo3s generation of units will struggle with lag etc.

    im just about to order a boateye360 to try on a NSS4 .. with the thought being like Braylor Fooks above… not wanting the headache of issues and just got straight HDMI input.

    i am keen to see how the boateye 360 will perform when set up as 4k mode on a garmin 9000 series

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *