SI-TEX Sirius 12 stabilized binoculars, stability at a nice price

Ben Stein

Ben Stein

Publisher of Panbo.com, passionate marine electronics enthusiast, 100-ton USCG master.

4 Responses

  1. Tom Petersen says:

    Ben, I have the Canon, Fujinon and more recently Sig Sauer. The clarity of the Sigs (and 16 power) is fantastic. However, what I have found between using all of them, the stabilization system works differently in each. The Sig and Canon stabilize great looking forward (while underway) but get a bit shaky looking a beam or aft. The Fijunon are smooth no matter what angle of the sea, which makes me think the movement of a yaw, pitch or roll affects the various stabilizing systems. We use all three frequently.

  2. Love my Fujis but as a skipper who travels for work, they are a beast to travel with. The Canons which were my workhorse for years had the unfortunate trait of rubber getting very sticky over time and eventually it was so annoying that I peeled it all off. Beats me why Canon doesn’t fix this problem. The problem is still reported in reviews. So these smallish Sigs might be just the ticket!

  3. Ben Ellison Ben Ellison says:

    Ben S, it’s great that the Si-Tex marine binocs let you see stabilized detail at 12x, but doesn’t that 4.8 degree field of view make it hard to find what you’re looking for and/or track moving targets?

    I ask because I think one of the main reasons I’ve been very happy with the Weems & Plath PRO 7×50 binocs (I wrote about back in 2018) is their 7.5° FoV. The big bright 7.14mm exit pupil helps too, I’m sure, but FoV is a separate spec that varies with eyepiece design as well as magnification.

    Then again, your vision may enable you to target binocs better than mine, but that’s also why I got to turn the $750 Pros into two very effective monoculars 😉

    https://panbo.com/weems-plath-pro-7×50-binoculars-customized-for-monocular-vision/

    • Ben Stein Ben Stein says:

      I haven’t found any issues with finding what I’m looking for, but a narrower field of view certainly creates that possibility. The 14 power Nikons I had sport a 4° FOV, so 4.8 is a solid 20 percent improvement on that. Like most things on our boats, binocular specs are a compromise. You won’t get higher magnification without shrinking the FOV. My understanding is that FOV can be increased at higher magnification through larger optics and more complex lens groupings. But those measures will come with increased weight and cost. I note the smaller optical target when you look through the eyepieces of the Sirius and I think that’s owing to the smaller and more affordable nature of these binoculars. I find the compromise acceptable but also understand that others may choose a different point on the magnification/cost/size/fov continuum.

      -Ben S.

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *