AIS, this ‘n’ that #7

Ben Ellison

Ben Ellison

Panbo editor, publisher & chief bottlewasher from 4/2005 until 8/2018, and now pleased to have Ben Stein as a very able publisher, webmaster, and editing colleague. Please don't regard him as an "expert"; he's getting quite old and thinks that "fadiddling fumble-putz" is a more accurate description.

14 Responses

  1. Kurt says:

    Hi Ben,
    Where did you get that figure from? Is this from AISlive/similar service or from the N-AIS. I don’t know much about the commercial AIS receive services, but coverage increases in N-AIS should create jumps like those in the graph you present. This reminds me that I need to get back to working on AIS statistics from all the data I have been collecting since 2006.
    -kurt

  2. Patrick Harman says:

    Ben,
    As a former legislative aide I can say your friend is correct,headlines and letter to the editor can definitely influence or make public policy. Editors are performing a public service by allowing citizens to point out the inane actions of government. The other issue they are sensitive to is attempts at cover ups or not disclose public information. This is true at all levels of government, for the legislative and executive branches.
    The mailing address and e-mail address’s should be available on their web site, and in the print version. This is a way to influence public policy without having to lead a lynch mob.
    Sign your letter and give contact information. They will not publish your name if you wish to be anonymous.
    Hope this helps and give you some encouragement.
    Pat

  3. Russ says:

    I doubt that any of the candidates have gone too deep on how to reform the FCC, but I suspect that things like Net Neutrality are going to be further up the list than AIS B.
    I’m still curious on people’s views on the basic question of why the FCC is not moving on Class B. Is it incompetence? Maritel spectrum license? Does somebody have a vested interest in not having it approved? If the CG thinks it’s a good idea, why aren’t they pushing harder from a Homeland Security and safety position?
    Could Ben, as an industry journalist, contact the CG for an official statement on Class B?

  4. Seajet says:

    Most of the larger metropolitan newspapers (i.e. Boston Globe, New York Times etc.) do have technology writers on staff. At the Boston Globe that would be Hiawatha Bray ([email protected]). I will try emailing him.

  5. Tim Flanagan says:

    I’ve just posted my own speculation about one possible cause of the Class B approval delay, which I call “the Jaberwocky Problem” for no very good reason other than I like the way it sounds.

  6. Dan (b393capt) says:

    In addition to this very good idea,
    1. Maybe someone can plant an idea in the head of a democratic presidential candidate that the executive branch almost alone is responsible for this outrageous delay in public safety potentially effecting xx million boat owners?
    2. Maybe someone can plant an idea in the head of a Republican presidential candidate that the executive branch almost alone is responsible for this outrageous delay in public safety / homeland security … and if action is taken quick the Dem’s won’t be able to capitialze on this?

  7. Lee Simpson says:

    I Have my annual work done at a boatyard in BC Canada. I asked them to install an AIS transponder. Turns out they installed a Simrad AI50 Class B.The unit works great. I find the safety factor of having the transmit side VERY VALUABLE.I wonder what will happen when all the Canadian boats come to the US with their Class B’s turned on.Perhaps I should turn myself into the FCC and see what happens. Like Jimmy Buffett, I could be a Pirate Turns 65.

  8. Mike says:

    As for the Jabberwocky problem,
    why not spend the few dollars necessary
    to get an actual Marine Station License for
    your boat and then you’ll have a street-legal,
    internationally-recognized MMSI.
    when BoatUS started their public service,
    it was annoying to do the paperwork and
    of course, costs money, although not much.
    now it’s much easier to do the stuff online
    with the FCC web site and it isn’t expensive.
    so just get an FCC-issued MMSI and check this
    annoyance off your list of reservations.
    cheers,
    -mo

  9. Tim Flanagan says:

    Mike, you’re correct, and that is almost certainly what I will do. That’s not the Jaberwocky Problem.
    The Jaberwocky Problem is what will the FCC do IF, as I suggest, they find themselves stuck between a Class B “rock” and a MMSI data-management quagmire “hard place”? Is THAT what’s preventing the FCC from approving Class B, while other countries, which don’t face the same potential MMSI confusion, have no such concern?
    Again, I don’t know…I’m just speculating.

  10. marinate says:

    I’d speculate that the delay is mainly down to the FCC having ‘better’ (in their mind anyway) things to do.
    The wireless bureau are currently in the midst of the 700MHz auctions. These have netted the government billions of dollars, so I’d be sure they are high priority in the FCC.
    I guess it’s just an unfortunate case of priority and limited resources.

  11. Seajet says:

    Lee, I seriously doubt, the U.S. FCC has any rights whatsoever to go after Canadian or other foreign registred boats, if they carry a properly registered AIS-B transponder. They are not under the jurisdiction of the USA.

  12. Dan says:

    Mike sez:
    As for the Jabberwocky problem,
    why not spend the few dollars necessary
    to get an actual Marine Station License for
    your boat and then you’ll have a street-legal,
    internationally-recognized MMSI.
    now it’s much easier to do the stuff online
    with the FCC web site and it isn’t expensive.
    so just get an FCC-issued MMSI and check this
    annoyance off your list of reservations.
    The FCC site is a nightmare. Any pointers about how to use it?

  13. Russ says:

    Seajet: The FCC most certainly does have jurisdiction over the usage of radio frequencies in the US and it’s territorial waters, in the same way that every other country does in their country and waters. Each country controls the usage of RF spectrum in it’s own country.
    If there is any doubt in your mind on this, trying operating an FM radio station from your boat while two miles offshore from New York city on the frequency used by WNBC and see how long it takes the FCC to find you, shut you down and fine you.
    This also extends to amateur radio operation, see the ARRL for more info at: http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/io/

  14. Richard-I says:

    A while ago when the IMO was debating what maritime allocated frequencies should be dedicated to AIS, I seem to remember the US having a problem with the ones preferred by the rest of the world. The reason being that those frequencies had been allocated to a particular organisation in the USA, who were reluctant to give them up. Somehow something was arranged, at least for SOLAS ships, perhaps because there are not so many in the world (14000?)and only a proportion of those in the US at any one time. I am only speculating, but Class B means a lot heavier use of the spectrum, maybe making it unusable to that particular organisation.

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published.